Archbishop Charles Chaput, soon to be installed as the next Archbishop of Philadelphia, gave a talk to the Catholic Association of Latino Leaders, which has now been published as an essay by the Witherspoon Institute. The essay is entitled “Nation of Faith; Nation of Immigrants,” and it explores how religion and American culture intersect historically and what Latinos bring with them into the U.S. cultural mix. Chaput addressed some of these themes in his book, Render unto Caesar.
Over at Sussidiario, Monsignor Lorenzo Albacete has an article up about the "elusive big idea" and how we may be too content with information and not content to proceed to judgment.
Many of the young theologians who gathered at Boston College for the Catholic Conversation Project have been invited by the USCCB Committee on Doctrine to a symposium in September entitled, “The Intellectual Tasks of the New Evangelization.” The fact that the bishops are reaching out to these theologians is a good sign that the kind of dialogue between bishops and theologians everyone seems to want is indeed starting on this most important project.
“But what does it mean?” This is still the most common question I get when the subject of the New Evangelization comes up. And, it is not easy to answer, in part, because the New Evangelization is designed to re-introduce a sense of wonder, not just a sense of comprehension, about the claims at the heart of our faith. Put differently, as Archbishop Martin of Dublin observed, Ireland may be the most catechized and least evangelized culture in Europe. That distinction between catechesis and evangelization is at the heart of what the New Evangelization is about.
With one appellate court ruling the Obama administration's health care reform was constitutional, and another ruling that the individual mandate was unconstitutional but not voiding the rest of the law, the question looms: Could the reforms survive without the individual mandates? You know what insurance companies think. And the prospect of higher premiums could cause even Democrats who supported the law to balk. Of course, one state, Vermont, won't have a problem because they are planning on switching to a single payer system which will realize cost-savings anyway.
Politico looks at the state of the question as we all wait for the Supreme Court to take the case,
That was fast. It seems to be a requirement for those seeking the GOP presidential nomination that they say truly outrageous things. Gov. Rick Perry, who announced his candidacy only Saturday, was asked his thoughts about the Federal Reserve. Here is his reply:
Set aside the bullying "treat him pretty ugly."
Set aside the charge of treason, which is a large charge.
Ask yourself this and see if you can ponder the answer with a straight face. Do you think Rick Perry knows anything about monetary policy?
Yesterday, I drove up to Dover, Massachusetts where Boston College has a retreat center. I was invited to attend the second meeting of what is now known as the Catholic Conversation Project. The retreat center’s old stone walls kept my phone from getting a signal, which is normally a blessing but with a flooding basement back home in Connecticut and my Dad charged with taking care of my three dogs, this was a challenge. But, the day was extraordinary nonetheless.
Over at Commonweal, Santiago Ramos has a review of a new biography, the first in English, of Maurice Blondel. I have not read the biography yet, but Ramos's fine essay makes me want to. As he rightly argues, the relative obscurity of Blondel in American circles is a thing to be regretted, so Ramos' essay and the new biography will hopefully begin bringing him to light.
Norm Ornstein has a very smart article at TNR comparing President Obama's re-election predicament - running during tough economic times with an ideologically driven and recalcitrant Congress - to that faced by Harry Truman in 1948. Ornstein's makes some of the same arguments I have been making for months, especially the fact that Obama needs to be a little less willing to find Common Ground and a little more willing to draw distinctions. And, as Ornstein points out, Truman faced Democratic opponents - in the general election - to his left (Henry Wallace) and his right (Strom Thurmond). But, Truman had two things that saved his presidency. First, he had pluck. He was a scrapper. Obama does his best when his back is against the wall, but he needs to show a little bit more fight and a little less professorial detachment, actually a lot less professorial detachment. Second, Truman was the only twentieth century president to lack a college degree but he was, arguably, the most well prepared president because he was deeply read in history. He had a wisdom that was uncanny and canny.
No one should think that the results of the Ames, Iowa straw poll are necessarily predictive of that state’s caucus results: Four years ago, Mitt Romney shelled out tons of money and effort to win the straw poll, which he did, only to lose the caucuses in January. But, something else happened four years ago. Seemingly out of nowhere, Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee came in second in the straw poll and it was he who went on to win the Iowa caucus.
This year, Michele Bachmann won the straw poll and, more importantly, she won the day after. She had some competition for the day after contest from Texas Governor Rick Perry, who tried to upstage the Iowa straw poll by announcing his own candidacy the same day in South Carolina. But, while his announcement succeeded in sharing the news cycle during the day on Saturday, Sunday was dominated by the news that Governor Tim Pawlenty was dropping out of the race and by the related coverage of Bachmann’s victory. I say “related” because Pawlenty had made a point of attacking Bachmann during last Thursday’s debate. The results of that strategy are now in: She won and he lost.
There are many nice things about taking a couple of weeks in Connecticut. Unlike the oppressive heat and humidity of DC, last night I needed a sweater when sitting outside on the porch.
Local newspapers, on the other hand, are a mixed blessing. They are trying valiantly to carve out a niche in an internet age, and that niche is, perforce, going to be a parochial one. Still, this morning's headline in "The Bulletin" out of Norwich, CT, was almost a caricature. I kid you not: "Unopened deli already a hit."
This brought to mind a contest held at the Times of London in the early part of the century in which editors competed to see who could get the most boring headline into the paper. The winner: "Earthquake in Chile Kills Few." The New Republic had a similar contest in the 1980s. I do not recall the gold medal winner - it was banal and had something about reality in the title. But, my fav was the title of a Flora Lewis column: "Worthwhile Canadian Initiative."
Should any newspaper or magazine entertain the idea of having another such contest, I now have my entry: Unopened deli already a hit.