Should a Catholic pick a favorite war film?

Jeremy Renner in Kathryn Bigelow's "The Hurt Locker" (2008) (Newscom/Summit Entertainment)

Just before Memorial Day, a friend who teaches in a Catholic high school wrote to me on Facebook that he and his daughter had just watched "Black Hawk Down," Ridley Scott's 2001 war film about the Battle of Mogadishu because she was studying Somalia. They really liked it. He then suggested that I ask my Facebook followers to share their favorite war movie and why.

I was stymied. Favorite war film? How can you have a favorite war film? These movies all recreate the very violence of the war story they tell. If British Prime Minister Winston Churchill said, "History is written by the victors," then who makes the movies and what ideology motivates them? If the war depicted is a war in defense of one's country or a nation's allies, or to stop genocide, was it the last resort? Did all efforts at nonviolent intervention and negotiation failed? Was it a just war? Or was it a war of choice? Because if the war was unjust to begin with, or a war of choice, who, then, are the heroes?

Here's a slightly edited version of what I messaged back to him:

"I feel so inundated with films that show the militarization of popular culture and the glorification of the U.S. military action in so many of the movies we make. I'd have to find a way to frame the question with some reflection. Like: Which war movie best reflects the teachings of Jesus in the Gospels? There are plenty of films that challenge the glorification and stupidity of war. So as a Catholic Christian, how would you frame the question to elicit thoughtful responses?"

He responded, "Good questions," and I didn't hear back from him on the subject.

Summertime is patriotically bookended by Memorial Day and Labor Day with Independence Day in the middle, so rather than solicit opinions, I decided to write a column on movies about war -- movies that demonstrate the inhumanity, nihilistic futility, and violence of armed conflict, followed by a list of films about war, that in my opinion, do not glorify it. Please note that almost 100 films, mostly documentaries, have been made about the war in Iraq alone.

I recently reviewed "Korengal," noting that filmmaker Sebastian Junger's norm for judging the validity of a war is by how much suffering of people it will relieve -- for example, U.S. intervention in Bosnia. In Junger's documentaries about the war in Afghanistan, he focuses on the harm to U.S. soldiers in a war of choice, something New York Times religion columnist Samuel G. Freedman wrote about in 2013: moral injury. Perhaps Junger's next film will be about "collateral damage" -- the thousands of innocents who die in wars or U.S. covert military actions.

Do you ever wonder why a police department in any city or town in the U.S. goes through such lengths to solve a cold case murder of one person? Yet don't the people we don't know, who are not Americans, who die as a result of our government's actions -- "collateral damage" -- count, too? Do not their lives cry out for justice as well?

"Paths of Glory" (1957): Directed by Stanley Kubrick and based on a 1935 novel by Humphrey Cobb, the film loosely refers to true incidents. French army Colonel Dax (Kirk Douglas), an attorney in his civilian life, attempts to defend his men against court martial after they refuse to continue a suicide mission. Although General Mireau (George Macready), who ordered the attack without written orders, knows it is futile, he insists and the mission fails. One hundred men are to be tried for cowardice but another general begs him to limit the number to three, randomly chosen from the three units involved. Idiotic decisions from ambitious generals are repeated throughout history, and to what end?

"Gallipoli" (1981): Directed by Peter Weir, the film focuses on two young men from Australia, Frank (Mel Gibson) and Archy (Mark Lee), who end up fighting on Turkey's Gallipoli Peninsula (Anzac Cove) during World War I. The allied forces are trying to deal a fatal blow to Turkey in order to get munitions and supplies across the Dardanelles to aid Russia. Though many think this film shows how the landings and battle defined Australian and New Zealand's identity, it is clear that the campaign was a disaster because of failed leadership. Tens of thousands died, including almost 9,000 from Australia and 3,000 from New Zealand.

"Apocalypse Now" (1979): During the Vietnam War, Col. Walter E. Kurtz (Marlon Brando) establishes a sanctuary deep in the jungle and becomes like a god to the local people. Capt. Willard (Martin Sheen) is sent in to eliminate Kurtz in Francis Ford Coppola's epic film based on Joseph Conrad's novel Heart of Darkness. The film critic Roger Ebert wrote, and I cannot say it any better, "The whole movie is a journey toward Willard's understanding of how Kurtz, one of the Army's best soldiers, penetrated the reality of war to such a depth that he could not look any longer without madness and despair."

"The Hurt Locker" (2008): Director Kathryn Bigelow won an Oscar for her cinéma vérité story of Sgt. 1st Class William James (Jeremy Renner), who becomes addicted to the adrenalin of disarming IEDs (improvised explosive devices) in Iraq. He gets home to find that the banality of daily life has become too much to bear, despite the fact that he is married with a young child, and returns to the army with death staring him in the face day in and day out.

"In the Valley of Elah" (2007): Based on a true story, a soldier, Mike Deerfield (Jonathan Tucker), returns from Iraq and goes missing. When the local police investigate, the military tries to block them. A detective (Charlize Theron) thinks that Deerfield's buddies are hiding something -- and they are. They have killed and dismembered Deerfield after a quarrel. Is it post-traumatic stress or are they covering up something that happened in Iraq?

"Taking Chance" (2009): Similar to the fictional "The Messenger" (2009) about soldiers who notify the families of the deaths of military personnel, "Taking Chance" is probably the most honest film to reflect the heart of America than any other war movie I have seen. Based on the true experiences of Lt. Col. Michael Strobl (Kevin Bacon), the film tells how Strobl, who was working a desk job, volunteers to escort the body of Pfc. Chance Phelps home because it is near where Strobl grew up -- but his reasons go deeper. He keeps a diary of his experience. All along the way, workers and travelers show respect for the remains of Phelps and compassion and honor for the man accompanying him. They instinctively know Strobl is a brave and good man. This movie breaks and uplifts and heals your heart at the same time because you realize that ordinary people do not make war. It's leaders who make war; hence, our responsibility to participate in our bruised democracy is more compelling than ever.

Perhaps you have a favorite film about war such as "Schindler's List" (1993) or "The Monuments Men" (2014; that just received a Catholics in Media Award on June 1), "Joyeux Noël" (2005), or "To End All Wars" (2001). The inhumanity of people to one another is what drives these films, even as soldiers struggle with doing the right thing.

I am often conflicted when I watch violent movies, and most war movies are extremely violent. Pax Christi's "Vow of Nonviolence" is worth contemplating. Movies about war (or that showcase violence as art) are a justification for the very war and violence they normalize and commercialize in the culture. Winning by killing and violence will not save us.

[Sr. Rose Pacatte, a member of the Daughters of St. Paul, is the director of the Pauline Center for Media Studies in Los Angeles.]

This story appeared in the July 4-17, 2014 print issue under the headline: War through a different lens .

Join the Conversation

Send your thoughts and reactions to Letters to the Editor. Learn more here