At Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, Fred Rotondaro lays out the big picture on income inequality. I wish he had been on CNN last night. They had someone from the Wall Street Journal who made the point, factually correct but grossly misleading without context, that the wealthy have been paying a great and greater share of federal taxes in recent decades. He failed to note what Rotondaro points out - they are paying more because they have garnered almost all of the income growth in hte past thirty years. The middle class is not paying more because they are not making more.
Meghan Clark is fast becoming one of my favorite young theologians. She has a post up at PoliticalTheology.com about entitlements that makes, with greater theological sophistication than I am capable of, one of the points I have been trying to make here: Yes, people, as people, are entitled to food, shelter and health care. She also usefully debunks the "false dichotomy" between person/private charity and government assistance. Good stuff.
It was clear that the strategists in Mitt Romney’s campaign thought that they had something damaging on President Obama when they released a copy of a tape, made fourteen years ago, in which Barack Obama, then a state senator, told an audience that he was in favor of some level of redistribution, at least enough to “give everybody a shot.” The Romney campaign released this video in response to the emergence of Romney’s now infamous “47%” comments. Alas for Romney, not all “secret” tapes are created equal.
I do not need to add anything to the large body of commentary about why Romney’s comments were wrong about the facts, and morally offensive to boot. The fact that you have prominent Republicans distancing themselves from Mr. Romney’s comments tells you all you need to know about their political consequences. But, I am more interested in why the Romney campaign thought the Obama tape about “redistribution” would serve as an effective counter. After all, government has always been involved in some kind of redistribution of wealth. That is what taxes do, take from some and give to projects or programs that will benefit others.
Following on Richard Cizik's article at R & P, over at Patheos, Greg Metzger has his interview with Brian McLaren, another evangelical leader who is looking to expand the range of the evangelical voice in the public square and who understands that such an expansion is mandated not by politics but by the Gospels. Good stuff.
Over at America magazine, Vince Miller has the story - a speech by Ryan that has been hiding in plain sight in which Ryan shows just how ideologically motivated he is. And his ideology is not Thomistic, it is Randian. Curious to see what Ryan's RC apologists will make of this!
Over at the splendid new blog, Millennial, Robert Christian takes down Mitt Romney regarding his dismissive comments about the 47% of Americans who do not pay federal income tax. You can read this passionate, well-reasoned post here.
Over at Il Sussidiario, Msgr. Lorenzo Albacete looks at the Holy Father's trip to Lebanon and specifically his speech to political and civic leaders. The pope's words resonate here in the US also, where some Catholics ignore a part of the Church's teaching and fail to see how those teachings all hang together.
Two items at the right-wing site "CatholicCulture.org" address the appointment of Jonathan Reyes to head the USCCB's Department of Justice, Peace and Human Development.
Phil Lawler can scarecely contain his excitement, both that John Carr is gone and Mr. Reyes is coming on board.
And Dr. Jeff Mirus likewise sees the change in earth-shattering terms.
George Weigel decries the influences and the effects of secularism in his latest column. Secularism worries me too. But, what I find ironic is that Mr. Weigel, as much as any contemporary Catholic writer, has been complicit in the march of secularism. How so?
Weigel invokes Charles Taylor’s observation about “exclusivist secularism” once thought to be a strictly European affair, the consequence of fights between conservative Catholics pining for the return of the ancient regime and those who associated that regime with the Church and, consequently, saw in the Church an enemy. In America, Weigel warns, the threat of secularism may be less direct but it is no less lethal.
At the Huffington Post, the finest commentary so far on the Chicago teachers' strike and the issue of education reform more generally, from the fine pen of Michael Peppard. You can find it here.