EPA to reconsider Kansas City nuclear plant for Superfund cleanup

 |  NCR Today

In what could be a major victory for anti-nuclear weapons activists, the Environmental Protection Agency said April 26 that it might put a Kansas City nuclear weapons plan on a priority list for cleanup.

Local Catholic Worker activists and others have been demanding the site be cleaned up before a proposed replacement site in Kansas City is built.

Two decades ago, the EPA left the Kansas City site (called the Bannister Plant) off the special Superfund list, but now it says it will reassess that decision.

The activists have raised serious concerns in the local media that the property on which the current plant is located would be abandoned and become a toxic blight on the neighborhood, even as plans go forward to build more nuclear weapons parts in the replacement plant.

Current and former plant workers are also worried about what they say is an unusually high rate of cancer among them.

The two federal agencies that oversee the site had previously said the property would be sold “as is” if possible.

Don't miss a thing! Get NCR's free newsletter.

New nuclear weapons projects are planned at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee and in Kansas City, Missouri.

Each city’s weapons facility creates parts for U.S. nuclear weapons.

Since the 1950s, non-nuclear parts for nuclear weapons have been manufactured at the Bannister site. The federal government owns the property, and the General Services Administration is the landlord.

The National Nuclear Security Administration has a contract with Honeywell to operate the manufacturing side, which takes up more than half the complex.

The GSA oversees the other side, where several government agencies and a day care are located. The IRS was at the site but moved downtown a few years ago.

PCBs, depleted uranium, trichloroethylene, asbestos and almost 800 other chemicals have been used at the plant. Environmental officials have said large plumes of pollution run underground.

The complex was firs

t assessed in 1987. At that time, 15 areas on the property were identified as Superfund sites, but they did not rank high enough on a hazard scale to qualify for the national priorities list.

Ann Suellentrop with Physicians for Social Responsibility said the EPA’s announcement is a “great first step.”

But after everything that has gone on, “we don’t have any trust,” Suellentrop said. “They have blown their trust.”

Support independent reporting on important issues.

 One family graphic_2016_250x103.jpg


NCR Comment code: (Comments can be found below)

Before you can post a comment, you must verify your email address at Disqus.com/verify.
Comments from unverified email addresses will be deleted.

  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the original idea will be deleted. NCR reserves the right to close comment threads when discussions are no longer productive.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report abuse" button. Once a comment has been flagged, an NCR staff member will investigate.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

For help on how to post a comment, visit our reference page.

Commenting is available during business hours, Central time, USA. Commenting is not available in the evenings, over weekends and on holidays. More details are available here. Comments are open on NCR's Facebook page.



NCR Email Alerts


In This Issue

July 14-27, 2017