Really? Breast-feeding as political debate?

 |  NCR Today

Perhaps you heard that Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-Minn.) criticized First Lady Michelle Obama after Obama said she tax code supported changes that put breast pumps in the category of medical devices.

The change allows mothers to either use pre-tax dollars in medical flexible-spending accounts to buy breast pumps or itemize their taxes and deduct the cost of the devices should their total out-of-pocket medical expenses be more than 7.5 percent of their annual income.

Bachmann claimed the tax code change amounted to creating a “nanny state.” She said the issue wasn’t breastfeeding per se, but “Washington’s use of the tax code to tell people how to run their lives.”

As someone who used a breast pump frequently to provide food for my firstborn while I was at work, I can unequivocally say two things about this controversy.

First, it is medical fact that breast milk is better for babies than formula, so we should do all we can to make it easy for women to breastfeed their infants in the first six months of life -- and pumping milk ain’t all that easy.

As the American Academy of Pediatrics states, “Human milk is species-specific, and all substitute feeding preparations differ markedly from it, making human milk uniquely superior for infant feeding.”

Christmas-NCR-gifts-half_0.jpgGive a subscription to our award-winning newspaper and save $10.

So, unless Mom is completely malnourished, an alcoholic or crack addict, she should be offering her milk to Junior and not infant formula

Second, if a tax code “incentive” to buy breast pumps is Washington telling people how to run their lives, then is the tax code regulation about deducting mortgage interest the same thing? What about deductions for conventions held in Bermuda? Or moving expenses for our pets? Are we all being told we must own a home, attend a convention in a tropical island and become the crazy cat lady when we want to move cross-country?

I don’t think so. And neither is labeling breast pumps medical devices the government’s attempt to tell us how to raise our kids. Instead, it is the government’s attempt to support women who do what is best for their children, something one would think Bachmann would support.

After all, she is part of the party that claims to be ‘pro-life,’ so it seems she should be flying her breast feeding freak flag in the front of the parade supporting good health for the babies brought into this world.

Then again, that would require her to be truly pro-life -- fighting the death penalty and questioning war and supporting WIC programs in addition to protesting abortion -- and that might be asking too much.

Support independent reporting on important issues.

 One family graphic_2016_250x103.jpg


NCR Comment code: (Comments can be found below)

Before you can post a comment, you must verify your email address at
Comments from unverified email addresses will be deleted.

  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the original idea will be deleted. NCR reserves the right to close comment threads when discussions are no longer productive.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report abuse" button. Once a comment has been flagged, an NCR staff member will investigate.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

For help on how to post a comment, visit our reference page.

Commenting is available during business hours, Central time, USA. Commenting is not available in the evenings, over weekends and on holidays. More details are available here. Comments are open on NCR's Facebook page.



NCR Email Alerts


In This Issue

July 14-27, 2017