I would encourage the reading of this latest opus by Dan Rodericks of the Baltimore Sun. Roderick’s comments become even more significant in light of the latest news of a 9 year old girl shooting her instructor with an Uzi.
Rodericks reports that guns are becoming more accurate, deadly, and safer. Gun enthusiasts seem enamored of “computerized, laser-based rifle scopes that turn amateurs into master snipers at 1,200 yards.”
There is apparently less enthusiasm for technology that prevents a gun from being used by anyone other than its rightful owner.
Rodericks tells the story of Andy Raymond, a gun store owner in Rockville, Md., who decided to sell a smart gun designed to function only when used by its owner. It is estimated such guns could prevent 37 percent of unintended gun deaths. Raymond changed his mind after a series of protests and death threats.
Raymond also noted, however, that such a response from gun advocates is hypocritical. Their argument is that no gun should be banned. Yet they now seek to ban any gun that would make us safer.
Such a story is really hard to understand. It sure does make it difficult to believe that the most vociferous proponents of Second Amendment gun rights have any genuine interest in having a reasonable discussion of protecting the legitimate rights of gun owners as well as protecting the safety of all of us.
Join the Conversation
Send your thoughts and reactions to our online Letters to the Editor column. Learn more here