Supreme Court temporarily blocks lower court rulings restricting abortion pills amid legal challenge

The U.S. Supreme Court, seen in Washington Oct. 2, 2022. (OSV News photo/Elizabeth Frantz, Reuters)

The U.S. Supreme Court, seen in Washington Oct. 2, 2022. (OSV News photo/Elizabeth Frantz, Reuters)

Join the Conversation

Send your thoughts to Letters to the Editor. Learn more

The U.S. Supreme Court said April 14 it would temporarily keep in place status quo federal regulations regarding the use of an abortion drug, giving the court additional time to consider a lower court's ruling to stay the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of the drug.

The Justice Department and the pharmaceutical company behind the abortion pill had asked the U.S. Supreme Court earlier in the day to intervene in the case. An order signed by Justice Samuel Alito stayed U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk's previous ruling in the case until April 19.

A coalition of pro-life opponents of mifepristone, the first of two drugs used in a medication or chemical abortion, sought for the FDA's approval of the drug to be revoked, arguing the government violated its own safety standard when it approved it in 2000. However, proponents countered mifepristone poses objectively little risk to women using it for abortion early in pregnancy, and claim the drug is being singled out for political reasons.

A federal appeals court on April 12 froze portions of a federal judge's ruling suspending the FDA's approval of a medication abortion pill, ruling that the drug can remain on the market but under more strict regulations while amid a legal challenge to that approval.

"The district court countermanded a scientific judgment FDA has maintained across five administrations; nullified the approval of a drug that has been safely used by millions of Americans over more than two decades; and upset reliance interests in a healthcare system that depends on the availability of mifepristone as an alternative to surgical abortion for women who choose to lawfully terminate their early pregnancies," the Justice Department wrote in its filing with the high court.

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed April 12 to temporarily block U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk's Good Friday ruling that suspended the FDA's approval of mifepristone.

However, the appeals court in its 2-1 decision also permitted other portions of that ruling to take effect, rolling back FDA rules revised in 2016 and 2021 on a drug the agency originally approved in 2000. Those rules permitted mifepristone's usage up to 10 weeks of pregnancy rather than the original seven weeks, and permitted its distribution by mail.

Bishop Michael Burbidge of Arlington, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Pro-Life Activities, welcomed the appeals court's ruling in an April 14 statement, saying it "was right to recognize the dangers of unrestricted chemical abortion to women's health and safety."

"We are grateful for the restoration of protections, and any limitation on the use of these lethal drugs," Burbidge said. "We hope that the final ruling will result in removal of chemical abortion from the market altogether. Abortion is never the right choice for a difficult or unexpected pregnancy, as it always ends one life and risks another. We pray ardently that our nation will authentically support and accompany women, so that ending the lives of their children alone in their own homes will be unthinkable."

Editor's note: This story has been updated to include April 14 action by the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Latest News

Advertisement

1x per dayDaily Newsletters
1x per weekWeekly Newsletters
2x WeeklyBiweekly Newsletters