Odd couple combo of bishops strikes blow for transparency

tIn what some wits might be tempted to call a minor miracle, this morning's session of the U.S. bishops’ meeting in San Antonio produced a small blow for transparency, engineered by an unlikely pair of prelates.

tToday's agenda called for the bishops to vote on several proposed new translations of liturgical texts, and under the rules of the conference a two-thirds vote of all bishops of the Latin Rite is required for approval. After brief floor debate, the vote on the first text ended up falling short, and so Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, president of the USCCB, announced that the measure would have to be settled by mail-ballots from bishops not present in San Antonio.

tIn keeping with the conference’s long-standing practice, George did not announce the results of the inconclusive vote.

At that stage, Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Nebraska, widely seen as one of the most conservative voices in the conference, rose to complain. He argued it’s “silly” that the results of an inconclusive vote are known by the USCCB staff, since they have to compile the results, but not shared with the bishops themselves.

Monsignor David Malloy, secretary general of the conference, replied that keeping the results confidential is designed to “protect the integrity of the electoral process.” He said that were the vote counts revealed, it could prompt “lobbying on one side or the other.”

Help fund independent Catholic journalism.
Donate now.

tNot long afterwards, Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk of Cincinnati, usually seen as a stalwart of the bishops' moderate-to-liberal wing, took the floor to say, “I think Bishop Bruskewitz has a point.”

tThe comment drew a wry laugh from many bishops, since Bruskewitz and Pilarczyk don’t generally find themselves on the same side of floor debates.

tIn the end, Pilarczyk made a motion to change the conference’s practice and to reveal the results of inconclusive debates. Archbishop Allen Vigneron of Detroit opposed it, arguing that it’s a bad idea “to make policy on the fly.”

Despite that, the measure passed, and from that point on George announced the results even of inconclusive votes. (For the record, the proposed texts fell just short of the required 163 votes in favor, making it probable that they will eventually be approved once the mail ballots are in.)

Support independent reporting on important issues.

 One family graphic_2016_250x103.jpg

Show comments

NCR Comment code: (Comments can be found below)

Before you can post a comment, you must verify your email address at Disqus.com/verify.
Comments from unverified email addresses will be deleted.

  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the original idea will be deleted. NCR reserves the right to close comment threads when discussions are no longer productive.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report abuse" button. Once a comment has been flagged, an NCR staff member will investigate.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

For help on how to post a comment, visit our reference page.

Commenting is available during business hours, Central time, USA. Commenting is not available in the evenings, over weekends and on holidays. More details are available here. Comments are open on NCR's Facebook page.