Wuerl Addresses Authority

 |  NCR Today

I love Washington Archbishop Wuerl and not just because he is my bishop. His column in the current issue of the archdiocesan newspaper takes up the issue of “Catholic Universities and Ecclesial Communion” without vitriol, without demonizing anyone, and points to the issue at the heart of the matter – what you might call the intrinsically touchy issue – namely, episcopal oversight.

Wuerl cites the document “Catholics in Political Life” issued by the USCCB in 2004. Unfortunately, he quotes only one half of the relevant bullet point – “The Catholic community and Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles” – while leaving out the second half: “They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions.” I think Father Jenkins has been very consistent in saying that the awarding of an honorary degree to the President does not “suggest support” for his position on abortion. And, I believe the bishops have done a good enough job teaching the Church’s position on abortion that it is disingenuous to suggest that having the President to Notre Dame will “confuse” people about what the Church teaches.

But, back to the plot. Wuerl minces no words: “While everyone may not agree with how an individual bishop applies this principle for institutions within his own diocese, it, nonetheless, is the bishop's call. Communion in and with the Church obliges its members, even in practical decisions, to support the legitimate exercise of a bishop's responsibility.” There are institutions and organizations that have a canonical mission, and those that don’t. Notre Dame does, and so it is answerable to ecclesial authority. Groups like the Cardinal Newman Society or Catholics for Choice do not have a canonical mission and are answerable only to themselves. They may be convincing or not, but they do not have the authority that comes with ecclesial communion.

Universities also have a scholarly responsibility to follow the evidence of reason and to maintain a fierce independence from any external ideology that would threaten the exercise of that responsibility. There will always be a tension between that academic freedom and the “freedom of the children of God” that the Church proclaims. Let’s hope that after Sunday’s commencement, we can go back to relishing that tension instead of seeing it exploited to score political points against the President.

Support independent reporting on important issues.

 One family graphic_2016_250x103.jpg


NCR Comment code: (Comments can be found below)

Before you can post a comment, you must verify your email address at Disqus.com/verify.
Comments from unverified email addresses will be deleted.

  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the original idea will be deleted. NCR reserves the right to close comment threads when discussions are no longer productive.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report abuse" button. Once a comment has been flagged, an NCR staff member will investigate.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

For help on how to post a comment, visit our reference page.

Commenting is available during business hours, Central time, USA. Commenting is not available in the evenings, over weekends and on holidays. More details are available here. Comments are open on NCR's Facebook page.



NCR Email Alerts


In This Issue

July 14-27, 2017