North Dakota bishops welcome abortion clinic's move to drop lawsuit

Bismarck, N.D. — The North Dakota Catholic Conference welcomed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging a 2013 law requiring doctors at the state's only abortion clinic to have admitting privileges at a local hospital.

The Red River Women's Clinic in Fargo withdrew the suit March 14 after a local health care system certified physicians working at the clinic to admit patients.

"So long as abortion is legal, the health and safety of women having abortions must be protected," said a statement from the Catholic conference, which represents the state's bishops. "We are pleased that the abortion clinic decided to comply with this common sense law rather than tie up the courts with its attempt to invent an unfettered right to abortion."

The Catholic conference expressed concern that "the clinic and its out-of-state lawyers were attempting to nullify common sense laws passed by the North Dakota legislature."

The statement also called for passage of a Human Life Amendment on the ballot in November. The amendment would prevent actions by courts to nullify bills limiting abortion and implementing safety measures for women's health care.

We say: Charlottesville reveals the weeping wound of racism. What do we, the American Catholic faith community, do next? Read the editorial.

The clinic's lawsuit stemmed from three abortion bills signed into law in March: one to require doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital; another to ban abortion for the purpose of sex selection or genetic abnormality; and a third to ban abortion after the 20th week of pregnancy. A U.S. District Court judge has blocked the 20-week ban from going into effect on the grounds it is unconstitutional.

The requirement for admitting privileges threatened to close Red River. But the clinic, assisted by the Center for Reproductive Rights, filed suit, leading to the agreement with the state.

Abortion opponents in many states have promoted the hospital admitting privilege requirement as a way to improve the quality of care women receive. Opponents of the provision say such laws restrict abortion availability, especially in rural areas, and that such privileges are unnecessary to ensure safety.

Support independent reporting on important issues.

 One family graphic_2016_250x103.jpg

Show comments

NCR Comment code: (Comments can be found below)

Before you can post a comment, you must verify your email address at
Comments from unverified email addresses will be deleted.

  • Be respectful. Do not attack the writer. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the original idea will be deleted. NCR reserves the right to close comment threads when discussions are no longer productive.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report abuse" button. Once a comment has been flagged, an NCR staff member will investigate.

For more detailed guidelines, visit our User Guidelines page.

For help on how to post a comment, visit our reference page.

Commenting is available during business hours, Central time, USA. Commenting is not available in the evenings, over weekends and on holidays. More details are available here. Comments are open on NCR's Facebook page.