New York Times editorial: 'What Happened to Zero Tolerance'?
The Times took on the U.S. bishops again writing: The indictment of a layman and four church figures — including a monsignor accused of covering up abuse — is proof that the bishops’ system of local and national review boards isn’t strong enough.
Board appointees are supposedly equipped to scrutinize each diocese’s adherence to zero tolerance. But the grand jury in Philadelphia found that the hierarchy there continued to protect accused priests despite repeated scandals and vows for reform.
The leader of the Philadelphia review board pointed to one major weakness: currently, any allegations about rogue priests are first vetted by chancery officials working for the archdiocese. They rightly should go directly to the review boards. This should be a universal no-brainer, along with stronger outside auditing of safeguard programs. Both were initially required, but the bishops subsequently eased that to a policy of “self-reporting” with audits every three years.
Sign up for NCR's Copy Desk Daily, and we'll email you recommended news and opinion articles each weekday.
The haunting question is how many other Philadelphias may be out there.
Join the Conversation
Send your thoughts and reactions to Letters to the Editor. Learn more here