Church leaders call for Zuma to do 'honorable thing' after court ruling

South African President Jacob Zuma is seen in Cape Town, South Africa, Feb. 12, 2015. (CNS/Pool via EPA)

Cape Town, South Africa — A prominent South African Jesuit called for President Jacob Zuma to resign after a court ruling that he violated the constitution remodeling his home.

The South African Council of Churches, which includes the Southern African Catholic Bishops' Conference, said after the ruling that it hopes Zuma will take "ownership of the quagmire he faces, consult with his political advisers and do the honorable thing in circumstances."

South Africa's constitutional court ruled March 31 that Zuma had failed to uphold the constitution by ignoring orders from a state watchdog agency that he repay some of the $16 million in state funds spent on upgrades to his private residence.

Fr. Russell Pollitt, director of the Jesuit Institute, said April 3 that South African can celebrate that the courts are functioning effectively, but he said the African National Congress has compromised its integrity by supporting Zuma.

He said "the church needs to be involved because these are the issues on people's minds" and recommended that churches put together a delegation as an immediate response to the ruling party's invitation to discuss the court's findings.

NCR is seeking an Executive Editor to oversee the editorial process and content of all products. Learn more

Following the unanimous ruling by the 11-judge constitutional court, Zuma did not apologize for any wrongdoing and instead was "dishonest and blamed everyone else" in his April 1 televised address to the nation, Pollitt said.

Among the court's findings are that the president "should pay back a reasonable portion of the money spent on non-security upgrades and reprimand the responsible ministers for their role in the project," the Jesuit Institute said in a March 31 statement.

The court also criticized parliament for passing a resolution that purported to nullify the public protector's findings on the state spending on the residence.

The Jesuit Institute said it welcomes "this balanced and well-reasoned judgment," which "shows that in South Africa, nobody is above the law."

The institute "urges that the court's orders be taken seriously by all affected," the statement said.

Upgrades at Zuma's rural residence in Nkandla included a visitor center, swimming pool, cattle enclosure, chicken run and amphitheater, aside from obvious security features such as accommodation for security staff, fencing and a helicopter pad.

The bishops' conference said in a March 17 statement that South Africa "is passing through a difficult period, politically and economically, and it is only by adhering to fundamental values of good governance and integrity in public life that we will be able to face up to and overcome our challenges."

The bishops were responding to an admission by South Africa's deputy finance minister that he was offered the post of finance minister by the Guptas, a family of Indian-born businessmen who relocated to South Africa in the 1990s.

"Such interference seriously undermines transparent and accountable governance in South Africa and betrays our people's struggle for political and economic freedom," the bishops said, noting that "it is vital that high offices of state should not be compromised by the involvement of parties with commercial or personal interests."


Join the Conversation

Send your thoughts and reactions to Letters to the Editor. Learn more here

Advertisement